In reviewing the blog by Kerr (2007), the learning debate is defended by soldiers in opposing camps. Is learning completed through behaviorism or cognitivism? In my opinion, learning occurs fundamentally from a behaviorist perspective and proceeds through the use of cognitivism. Foremost, learners must first be motivated to learn (Behavioral). The task of learning requires the learner to be motivated to accomplish the task of learning. How do we motivate learners? Testing is a – tradition. Is it an accurate account of true learning? True learning is a developmental process in which the learner builds readily on basic concepts, ultimately acquiring the ability to be able to think critically, and problem solve (Driscoll, 2005). Demonstrating the use of critical thinking and problem solving is a much more reliable method of measuring learning acquisition.
Orey (2001) posits that learning is a cognitive process in which learning occurs through stages. Sensory input transfers information to short term memory. Elaboration moves this information into long term memory. Links are created for information retrieval. When one has difficulty recalling information, it is due to a faulty recall link. Rehearsal through application may improve the link, making recall more readily available.
References
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.).Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Orey, M. (2001). Information processing. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Information_processing
Reflections 